Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:01

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

With red carpet and a second line, New Orleans welcomes 6,000 Pokémon competitors - NOLA.com

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Russia can stop this any time.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Does red light therapy do anything inside the body, other than just the skin that receives the light? Are there any obscure health benefits?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

New COVID variant swiftly gains ground in US; concern looms for summer wave - Ars Technica

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Rory McIlroy destroys tee marker but survives cut at U.S. Open - NBC Sports

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Thank you.

When was the first time your wife had beastiality?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Do you have a “no-no” list?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Why do humans sweat while stressed?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

What can we learn from the fatal shooting of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson?

What’s next?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Is it possible to start a small scale domestic BPO (Call Center)?